The image represents our inability to perceive outside our own construct; The ability to see what we are beyond the limits which our synapse's fire. We are alltrapped inside the world of our own creation. Fortunately, we have the ability toanalyze this creation of ours (the book I am looking at). However, attempts to leap outside of the cube lead to utter darkness. Why am I naked? Simply to implypurity (I would have shaved if I had the forethought).
It draws the eye to consider a deeper meaning. Adding clothes is unnecessary and would cloud the type of observation intended. I think I'll title it "trapped inside our own construct"
It has been touted discredit to information theory when the theory creator is considered in the equation. How can a creator of information theory have a valid theory when all it can know is the result of what goes on in the mind in response to what it receives as its external environment?
Well, it is at least given that the theory is only valid as long as it works in the confinements of our perception.
With an abundance of data, may it be a collection of quarks or a sheet list of day to day stock changes, under similar circumstances with respect to the data, the ruler can measure a known quantity of that thing smaller than it's unit and of somewhat equal measure can the ruler measure the sum of the heights and return a value then to be divided by the quantity. But this method is only persistent for a short time since the mechanism involved in the feedback is constantly changing and sometimes evolving to something new or the mechanism is becoming extinct.
...to be continued...
Axioms
Metal and Flesh 2001 |
Reoccurring questions surround realms of conscious and unconscious activity especially when differences between life and matter are to be examined. The question that would bare all answers is what is this activity? Conscious and unconscious states are composed of many processors. Do these processors have dependencies? To ask we might want to ask what processors are required to sustain the conscious and unconscious states. What is accepted conjecture about the process of the processors is that no central clock commands these processes. Rather it appears that these processors operate on the condition they receive input from another process. This appearance is present in the examination of information flow in the universal: Simply our algorithm is causal and not formulate. This is argued, however, that our perceptive tools being an artifact of this algorithm, we cannot examine what might be a central clock without having immeasurable effects to our sample. Therefor, we cannot prove that our algorithm is formulative nor can we disprove that our algorithm is causal. However, for the sake of our perceptive tools, our algorithm is causal for most endeavors. to be continued... |
1 comment:
top [url=http://www.c-online-casino.co.uk/]uk online casinos[/url] check the latest [url=http://www.realcazinoz.com/]realcazinoz.com[/url] manumitted no deposit perk at the foremost [url=http://www.baywatchcasino.com/]online casino
[/url].
Post a Comment